Court docket declines request to launch Karen, Lang’ata residents’ knowledge 

Justice Linnet Ndolo dismissed the appliance by Mr Samora Sikalieh saying his place because the chairman is contested and the matter was pending in court docket. PHOTO | POOL

The chairman of Karen and Lang’ata District Affiliation has misplaced an utility looking for to compel the affiliation’s workplace administrator to launch the group’s laptop computer and cell phone, containing the private particulars of members.

Justice Linnet Ndolo dismissed the appliance by Mr Samora Sikalieh saying his place because the chairman is contested and the matter was pending in court docket. 

She added that the workplace administrator, Ms Rosebell Wacuka Karobia, who had been suspended and later recalled maintained that she has no authority to launch personal members’ knowledge, which the chairman wished to entry.

“In gentle of this, the court docket shouldn’t be happy that the claimant has met the brink for gaining of the necessary injunction on the interlocutory stage,” the decide mentioned. 

Mr Sikalieh moved to court docket accusing Ms Karobia of insubordination for refusing at hand over the laptop computer and a cell phone, which she mentioned belonged to the affiliation. 

ALSO READ: Lang’ata property developer ordered to filter water for residents

He had requested the court docket to compel Ms Karobia to launch a laptop computer, the affiliation’s cell phone and the passwords, along with a complete report.

The court docket heard that Ms Karobia was employed as an workplace administrator in Might 2018. Her workplace is the nerve heart of the affiliation, as she undertakes every day administrative roles to advertise the group’s targets. 

The decide heard that the laptop computer contained data together with names, ages, and bodily addresses of the members, their property and contributions of every member.

Ms Karobia was allegedly despatched on obligatory depart on July 4, with out pay pending investigations.

Mr Sikalieh mentioned she has refused at hand over the laptop computer and cell phone as directed, a transfer that allegedly grounded the operations of the affiliation.

He mentioned the refusal to launch the laptop computer was in violation of the provisions of the Information Safety Act.

The chairman mentioned he was apprehensive that she could share the confidential private knowledge with third events who could use it in opposition to members of the affiliation.

However Ms Karobia opposed the appliance and defined that the affiliation constitutes a committee headed by the chairman and a secretariat headed by the workplace administrator. 

The secretariat, she mentioned, runs every day operations of the operations whereas the committee is answerable for oversight and that she has occupied the place for the final eight years underneath 4 completely different committees.

The court docket heard that the affiliation held a rare basic assembly on September 7, the place she was eliminated along with different committee members and a caretaker committee was elected.

ALSO READ: Home costs rise at quickest tempo in over three years

He mentioned the chairman misplaced the capability to symbolize the affiliation or sue on its behalf.

She mentioned she is personally and individually answerable for the security and safety of the information and after he was elected, the chairman requested her to ahead to his personal electronic mail the members’ knowledge for his private use, a request she declined.

She accused the chairman of blackmailing and intimidating her and the choice to ship her on obligatory depart was made unilaterally by the chairman with the goal of achieve entry to the information.

[email protected]